EQUIPMENT CHOICES
Some folks have been wondering about switching from film to digital. Virginia, Arnold and Darius have already purchased their new Nikon D70 cameras since the workshop. Fresh from a shoot in Kenya, David Alan Harvey inspired us to try digital with his gorgeous pictures from Kenya shot with a Nikon D70. Plus, Ben had really good results throughout the week with his digital Canon.
At the start of our week in San Miguel de Allende I was not sure whether I should use my 35mm film camera or my digital SLR. Our instructors gave me some good advice: shoot with the camera you’re going to use most often. So, I shot the week with my Nikon D70. I was glad that I did.
At photo l.a. I saw several lectures from fine art photographers: Alec Soth, John Humble, Robert Flick, Mona Kuhn. A theme I picked up from them is that you need to choose equipment that best expresses your work and fits best with your working style.
For his Mississippi project, Alec Soth used an 8x10 view camera on a tripod. His process of fiddling with the camera allows his subjects to relax into the picture. Before he photographs, he has people sign a release. So, the subjects know that they will be hanging out with Alex while he sets up the shot. One effect is that he misses spontaneous moments. He said that he has a hard time capturing a natural smile and other emtions using this method.
John Humble records the LA landscape. He uses a 4x5 view camera with film on a tripod. He is interested in switching to digital, but is not yet satisfied with the quality of large prints (20” x 24”) from a digital capture. When he photographs, he goes out with a van and places his view camera and tripod on top of his van. He sets up his shot, then waits to capture a spontaneous moment. He prefers to have some people in his landscapes, so he waits for a person to enter his shot. The people provide spontaneity.
Robert Flick’s work is a visual mapping of LA neighborhoods. He uses collage to show how a neighborhood changes as you move through it. He has photographed neighborhoods – sometimes the same ones - in LA for decades using many types of equipment: black and white film, color film and now digitally. Due to the nature of his work, he has started to use a digital video camera to make still images. The video camera allows him to record the streets while driving in a continuous line. Then, on the computer, he chooses his prints from the video stream. His final images are collages of still images that map his journeys through LA neighborhoods.
Mona Kuhn prefers to use a Hasselblad film camera. She prefers not to use a tripod as she photographs using daylight and gets very close to her subjects – figurative nudes. She prefers the freedom to move around while photographing to collaborate with her subjects. She takes advantage of spontaneous elements. She enjoys exploiting the square frame of the Hasselblad. Mona spends time making photos for two months of the year in a seaside location in France. Where she makes photos, there is no electricity. So, she does not see her work until she returns home to San Francisco. Working with digital would be difficult as she cannot plug in a computer or recharge camera batteries.

1 Comments:
So I just went digital. Well pretty much anyway. And here's my thoughts on the transition.
This was a very big decision for me. It's a huge decision financially (Canon 1D Mark II - I'll be paying for this thing for a very long time), and also just in the way I will make pictures now. Now I get to learn what all this "white balance" nonsense is all about... and Photoshop... so on and so forth.
Bottom line, I have to make it my tool for making compelling pictures. The photographer still makes the pictures, not the camera. I will adapt to it and make it my own - I have no choice now.
So why did I do it? Here's why:
1) As I'm trying to get into photojournalism, digital is where the industry is now. From those in the industry that I've talked to (Nevada Wier, Ben Krain, articles from PDNonline, etc.), if you don't go digital now, it's just going to be that much harder to break in later. The industry is moving, with or without you.
2) I love the thought of shooting 'unlimited'. I don't have to worry about where 'frame number 36' is when something is happening, and I can really 'sketch' a situation as Kent Kobersteen put it. That makes me smile.
3) Abitity to change ISO on the fly. Anyone remember my 'blurry' photos from my first couple of days at the workshop... I was stuck with 100 ISO film when it was getting dark. Painful. This is the answer.
4) It's quieter than my film SLR - no winder. It's still no Leica when it comes to quietness, but hopefully it won't scare the hell out people when I take their picture, which has happened with my EOS 3.
5) I don't have to go through the nighmare of scanning my images anymore. Those of you who scan their edited slides know what I'm talking about.
6) No more Xray issues at the airport. In the big picture this is pretty trivial, but man will this be nice to not have to worry about packing/sending film and just go through security without the big scene caused by unwilling TSA folks to hand-check film.
My hesitations about going digital:
1) Image quality. Film is still king in my opinion for image quality, especially when you're shooting specialty films like Velvia, Portra NC, or grainy B&W. Digital just doesn't give the same color palettes and grain. This is where I had to tell myself, content over image quality is what matters.
2) Size. The camera is big, too big. I feel intrusive with it. But this is something I have to work through and get used to. Lots of very successful photojournalists are using these beasts in sensitive situations, so can I. As Alfred Eisenstaedt put it, "It's more important to click with people than to click the shutter." Use your demeanor as a tool as well as your camera. (I just made that up.)
3) Cost vs. the rate of change in technology. Let's face it, the 1D Mk. II may be the cream of the crop now, but I'm well aware that in a couple of years, or maybe less, that 8.2MP from this thing just won't cut it. It WILL get outdated sooner than later. That's an expensive piece of equipment to get outdated within the forseeable future. There's no good answer to this.
4) It's basically a computer.. if something goes wrong with it, I can't just open it up and check it out... I will be at the mercy of certified technicians from now on. And I hate that.
So I had better make the most of it. It's time to put this thing to heavy use and hone my abilities. This is all part of the dream. :)
Let me know if anyone has any questions...
Lance
ps - I'll still save my medium format film camera (Mamiya 645) for fine art landscape and portrait work... as long as there's film around, I'm going to love using it for this type of work.
Tuesday, February 01, 2005
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home